Lender Directed Voting
Full Entitlement Voting
Activities & Engagements
Thursday, February 12, 2015
CSMFE Submits Comments on FSB Data Collection Proposals
Aircraft pilots cannot monitor risks based solely on altitude; neither can market supervisors.
On February 12, 2015, the Center for the Study of Financial Market Evolution ("CSFME" or the "Center") filed its
to the Financial Stability Board’s (FSB) consultation,
Standards and Processes for Global Securities Financing Data Collection and Aggregation
("Consultation Paper”). The Consultation Paper proposes a system of data collection intended to help market supervisors infer changes in systemic risk that are said to be created by securities lenders, repo traders and margin lenders. Previously, as part of their larger workstream on shadow banking,
the FSB recommended
that national/regional authorities collect appropriate data on securities financing markets to help the FSB better assess ongoing financial stability. The Consultation Paper is a proposal regarding what kinds of data on repo, securities lending, and margin lending should be collected, how they should be collected, and in what format.
In its letter, CSFME asserts that the Consultation Paper's focus on global aggregates limited to position metrics "will have minimal value, and may well prove to be misleading." While position aggregates in securities lending may help track the level of cash collateralized loans, these metrics alone cannot track the risk of collateral fire sales, one of the main systemic risks that supervisors have linked to securities finance. Rather, the Center proposes that FSB and national and regional authorities expand the data initiative beyond position aggregates, to include risk mitigation resources as well as termination activity.
According to CSFME, to have a true understanding of the risk associated with collateral fire sales, loan recalls and returns must be tracked along with position aggregates. In addition, because lending agents can mitigate these termination risks with rebate incentives, cash buffers and loan substitutions, these mitigation techniques and practices must be considered as well.
Funds enlist Vendors to Hike the Stakes in $50 billion Class Action vs Dealers
Pension Funds File Sweeping Securities Lending Class Action
Fed President Sees Rebound in Inflation and Modest Wage Growth
FSB Publishes its Sixth Annual Shadow Banking Survey
Basel Report: "Repo Markets are Not Settled Yet"
Lack of Haircut Data Hampers E.U. SFT Risk Assessment
Basel Issues Step-In Risk Consultation Sequel
Basel Clarifies NSFR Repo Treatment
FSB Issues Recommendations for Asset Management Vulnerabilities
FSB Takes a New Approach to Collateral Re-use and Re-hypothecation
Fed Report Finds Regulation Harming Repo Markets and Liquidity
Is Blockchain the Future of Securities Lending?
Basel Chair Calls for More Research into Bank Risk Models
Enlightened, not Reactive Regulation: Now It Starts
FSB Announces Priorities for 2017
Sovereign Wealth Funds Could Boost Global Liquidity
What to Expect from the Final Cut of Basel III
FSOC Wants Better Securities Lending and Repo Data
SIFMA's Full-Throated Defense of Securities Lending
Has Crisis Regulation Made Banks Less Safe?
GFMA Measures the Costs of Basel Reforms
A First Step Toward Permanent Securities Lending Data Collection
The Long Reach of the SEC
The Cost of Everything and The Benefit of Nothing
SIFMA Issues 2016 Repo Market Fact Sheet
FSB Chair Reports to the G20
EU Urges a New Look at Basel Reforms
The New Shape of Shadow Banking Regulation
FSB Publishes Policy Framework for “Vulnerable” Asset Management Activities
April Fed Statistics Reveal Decrease in Collateral in the U.S. Tri-Party Repo Market
All Content Copyright © CSFME, unless otherwise noted