Regulatory Outreach for Student Education

Engaging Students in the Debate Over Financial Services Reform

Today’s debate over regulatory reform is a watershed activity in the careers of financial industry professionals. Years ago, similar debates over mandated pre-funding of pension liabilities (ERISA) and the reunification of investment banking with commercial banking (Glass Steagall's repeal) changed the direction of financial market evolution. Opinions may differ on the merits of those changes, but no one disputes their significance.

Without question, college students and young professionals should be well-versed in the issues involved in today's debate. The Regulatory Outreach for Student Education (ROSE) program is the Center's way to give top students, tomorrow's business and finance leaders, opportunities to experience the financial regulatory process up-close.  The ROSE program is designed to put students in touch with the regulators, policy-makers, and industry leaders who are currently shaping the financial regulatory landscape.  We then challenge them to research and articulate their own positions on the most intriguing and interesting issues.  

ROSE Program Blog

Sunday, June 15, 2014

Italy’s Mediobanca Equity Sell-off and Privatization Spark Renaissance in Corporate Governance


Author: David Schwartz J.D. CPA

The Economist reports that Mediobanca, an Italian investment bank formed in 1946 assist in the reconstruction of Italian industry, has commenced a planned sell-off of $2.2 billion in equity holdings as part of an effort to refocus the firm on its core mission of providing medium-term financing in the Italian sector.  Mediobanca’s sales of these shares as part of its unwinding of webs of cross-shareholdings and pacts among big shareholders, as well as the privatization of Fincantieri and Poste Itliane, have released large volumes of shares on to the markets, allowing institutional and other investors to add them to their portfolios.  This sudden flow of Italian equities in to the hands of new investors has, it seems, increased participation in corporate governance.

The shift seems already to be affecting corporate governance. Attendance and participation at shareholder meetings have increased. The recent vote on a poorly drafted ethics clause put forward by the government at various partly state-owned firms illustrates the difference such shareholders make. At Eni, Finmeccanica and Terna, which have lots of institutional shareholders, the clause, which seemed to muddy the treatment of managers charged with financial crimes, was voted down. However at Enel, the former electricity monopoly, which has fewer institutional investors, it was approved.


In the hands of new investors, these equities that were previously locked up in voting trusts or held by the government seem to have fueled a renewed interest in participation in the governance of Italian firms.


Print