Thursday, October 6, 2022

Is T+1 Something We Can All Agree On?

The Industry Reacts to a Compressed Settlement Plan

Author: David Schwartz J.D. CPA

In moving to shorten the U.S. securities settlement cycle by one day to T+1, the Securities and Exchange Commission appears to have hit on something upon which virtually everyone can agree. Judging by the comments to the SEC's T+1 proposal, everyone from State Street to the Cornell Securities Law Clinic agrees that moving to T+1 is both desirable and beneficial to risk management in the long run. That said, despite this rare moment of accord between the regulator and the regulated, according to some commenters, some parts of the proposed implementation need attention, fine-tuning, or reconsideration. 

Comments (0)
Number of views (1398)

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

ICI President Resolute that Asset Management is Not a Source of Financial Instability

Author: David Schwartz J.D. CPA
strong defense of the stability and safety of the asset management industry, Investment Company Institute President and CEO Paul Schott Stevens told the Mutual Fund and Investment Management Conference that not only are asset managers and the funds that they offer not sources of risk to the overall financial system, but some misguided efforts to regulate them as such may do vastly more harm than good.  Mr. Stevens' remarks were a reaction to reports recently issued by the Office of Financial Research (OFR) and others concluding that asset management firms and the activities in which they engage can introduce vulnerabilities that could pose, amplify, or transmit threats to financial stability.  Stevens worries that the conclusions of the OFR report and a similar report by the Financial Stability Board, "could be the predicate for new, bank-style prudential regulation of the asset management industry—which could significantly harm funds and the investors who use them."
Comments (0)
Number of views (6493)
RSS