Monday, January 6, 2014

Fed Attention Turns to Wholesale Financing Activities

A New Focus on the Risks Associated with Repos, Reverse repos, Securities Lending, and Securities Margin Lending

Author: David Schwartz J.D. CPA
In a November 22, 2013 address before the Americans for Financial Reform and Economic Policy Institute Conference, Federal Reserve Board Governor Daniel K. Tarullo outlined a potential regulatory initiative to limit short-term wholesale funding risks. As we mentioned in our November 6, 2013 post regarding Fed President William C. Dudley's concerns about tri-party repo, the Fed remains worried about the systemic risk posed by disturbances in the short-term wholesale funding market as a whole. Tarullo's speech, however, goes further than Dudely's.  Tarullo did not merely iterate the Fed's worries about the vulnerabilities created by the short term wholesale funding market, but actually outlined a regulatory framework by which the Fed may limit the systematic risks posed by short-term funding activities.
Comments (0)
Number of views (7869)

Monday, April 8, 2013

Fed Sheds Some Light on "Systematically Important" Non-Banks

Author: David Schwartz J.D. CPA
The Federal Reserve Board has approved rules making it clearer which non-banks can be swept into the Board's regulatory ambit and under what circumstances they may be "systematically important."  The March 29, 2013 release lays out the Fed's requirements for determining when a company is “predominantly engaged in financial activities,” and defines the terms, "significant nonbank financial company" and "significant bank holding company." These three definitions will be used by the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) when it considers whether a nonbank financial company could pose a threat to the financial stability of the United  States, and whether it should be subject to consolidated supervision by the Federal Reserve. Consistent with the requirements of Title I, section 113 of the Dodd Frank Act, a firm will be considered significant if it has $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets or has been designated by the FSOC as systemically important. Under the Fed's new rules, a company is considered to be “predominantly engaged” in financial activities if either: (i) the annual gross revenues derived by the company and all of its subsidiaries from financial activities, as well as from the ownership or control of an insured depository institution, represent 85 percent or more of the consolidated annual gross revenues of the company; or  (ii)the consolidated assets of the company and all of its subsidiaries related to financial activities, as well as related to the ownership or control of an insured depository institution, represent 85 percent or more of the consolidated assets of the company. The Fed has listed the types of financial activities that will be considered when applying the test above.  The Fed has also carved out numerous exceptions for certain kinds of financial activities based on comments, and excluded them from the test.  For example, the Fed will not consider...
Comments (0)
Number of views (6872)

Friday, January 4, 2013

Fed Departs from Traditional Approach to Foreign Banks in the US

Author: David Schwartz J.D. CPA
On December 14, 2012, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Fed) issued for public comment a rule proposal that, if adopted, could drastically alter the structure and operations of foreign banking organizations (FBOs) in the U.S.  The Fed's proposal drastically limits the flexibility FBOs have historically had in structuring their U.S. banking and financial operations. The proposed rules would also impose capital, liquidity, stress testing, and other requirements on a FBO’s U.S. operations similar to those imposed on domestic U.S. banks.  The extent to which FBOs with U.S. operations will find themselves burdened with these new regulations will vary based on the size of their global operations and their presence in the U.S.
Comments (0)
Number of views (6921)

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Test Anxiety: Fed Issues Guidelines for 2013 Bank Stress Testing

Author: David Schwartz J.D. CPA
On November 5, 2012, the Federal Reserve Board (the “Fed”) issued instructions and guidelines for two 2013 stress testing and capital planning programs. Based on similar programs instituted in 2012, the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review 2013 describes the processes for testing and development of capital plans that are required for the 19 bank holding companies ("BHCs") that participated in the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review in 2011 and 2012. The Capital Plan Review 2013 details the testing and capital planning requirements for the 11 BHCs with $50 billion or more in consolidated assets that undertook a similar exercise last year.
Comments (0)
Number of views (5908)
Full Article

Categories: All

Tags: Fed, stress testing

Saturday, November 17, 2012

FOMC Mulls Change of Tactics to Fed Funds Rate Changes

Author: David Schwartz J.D. CPA
The latest Federal Reserve Open Market Committee ("FOMC") minutes reveal serious consideration of an approach to monetary policy whereby the Fed uses quantitative triggers based on unemployment rates and inflation, as opposed to date-based thresholds, to guide its changes in the federal funds rate.  This is an approach championed by Charles Evans, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.  Under Evans's approach to monetary policy, the Federal Reserve would promise to keep rates at zero until unemployment drops to a certain level unless inflation reaches a particular ceiling. The October 23-24, 2012 minutes show that the Evans approach may be gaining some support among the FOMC, although some participants urged caution.
Comments (0)
Number of views (7176)
RSS
1234