Friday, June 6, 2014

Blackrock Pushes Back on FSOC Concerns About Securities Lending

Author: David Schwartz J.D. CPA

In a May 29, 2014 white paper, Blackrock responded strongly to the Financial Stability Oversight Council’s (FSOC) 2014 Annual Report that raised concerns about asset managers and securities lending. In particular, Blackrock’s paper takes issue with FSOC’s assertion that indemnity provided to lending clients by asset managers acting as securities lending agents created extra risk because asset managers do not face the same capital and liquidity requirements as their bank counterparts. In response, Blackrock said that, “borrower default indemnification is an established practice in securities lending, provided by the majority of lending agents to a variety of clients.” Further, because all securities loans are fully collateralized, lending agents’ exposure for borrower default indemnification is quite limited.

Comments (0)
Number of views (7073)

Wednesday, May 21, 2014

FSOC's 2014 Annual Report Addresses Some Securities Lending and Repo Risks

Author: David Schwartz J.D. CPA
The US Financial Stability Oversight Council has published its 2014 Annual Report which highlights, among other things, the activities of the Council, significant financial market and regulatory developments, an assessment of those developments on the stability of the financial system, and potential emerging threats to the financial stability of the United States. The report highlights two forward-looking risks specifically in securities finance and collateral management, and remarks on uncertainties that remain for money fund regulation.
Comments (0)
Number of views (9566)

Tuesday, May 20, 2014

Congress Raises More Concerns Regarding SIFI Designation

Congress Calls into Question FSB's Role in SIFI Designation

Author: David Schwartz J.D. CPA
Congress has once again raised concerns about the Fed's plans for non-bank SIFIS.  In a May 9, 2014 letter to Treasury Secretary Jack Lew, Fed Chair Yellen, and SEC Chair Mary Jo White, members of the US House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services questioned the role of the Financial Stability Board, an international body which is an unincorporated Swiss association with no authority or oversight under US law, in the process for designation of G-SIFIs. The authors of letter are generally concerned “about decisions being made that could have a significant impact on the U.S. economy and its citizens through a nontransparent process, by an international body that is not accountable to the American people.”
Comments (0)
Number of views (7328)

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

FSOC Takes Heat from Congress over Asset Manager SIFI Designation

A Bipartisan Congressional Demand for More Transparency and Cooperation

Author: David Schwartz J.D. CPA

Congress has once again expressed concerns about SIFI designation and the asset management industry, and in particular the openness and integrity of the regulatory bodies developing SIFI policy. In reaction to the Office of Financial Research's (OFR) September 2013 report analyzing the potential systemic risks of the asset management industry, 41 members of Congress penned an April 9, 2013 letter to the Financial Stability Oversight Council requesting that any further review of the asset management industry take place “in an open and transparent manner.” The bipartisan letter also harshly criticizes the OFR report substantively and requests that the FSOC revisit its process and findings to “precisely identify the systemic risks it is trying to address” and “explain in detail how any identified risks would be mitigated” by subjecting asset management firms to supervision by the Federal Reserve. In addition, the letter urges that any regulatory action ultimately implemented should “not limit access to these services or cause them to become cost-prohibitive.”

Comments (0)
Number of views (7357)

Thursday, April 3, 2014

SEC Proposes Rules for Systemically Important and Security-Based Swap Clearing Agencies

Proposal Reserves Great Discretion for the SEC

Author: David Schwartz J.D. CPA
“Clearing agencies that have been designated as systemically important or that clear security-based swaps are a backbone of the U.S. financial markets. The enhanced regulatory regime proposed today reflects the importance of effective regulation of these entities.” 
---SEC Chairman Mary Jo White 

The Securities and Exchange Commission voted on March 12 to propose new rules to enhance the oversight of clearing agencies that are deemed to be systemically important or that are involved in complex transactions like security-based swaps. The Dodd-Frank Act calls for a new framework of regulation for certain clearing agencies, and these rules, if adopted, would apply to SEC-registered clearing agencies that have been designated as systemically important by the FSOC. The rules would also sweep into their regulatory ambit clearing agencies not deemed systemically important, but that take part in highly complex transactions, such as clearing security-based swaps.

Comments (0)
Number of views (6407)
RSS
1234