Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Shadow Banking: Less is More.

Is Deregulation the Most Effective Way to Deal with Shadow Banking?

Author: David Schwartz J.D. CPA
These heightened capital requirements for licensed banks may trigger even more regulatory arbitrage than was observed in the recent past, thereby inducing a large migration of banking activities towards the shadow banking system. The higher solvency of the licensed banking system may then be more than offset by such growth in shadow banking, ultimately increasing the aggregate exposure of the money-like liabilities issued by both the formal and shadow banking sectors to shocks on loans.


It has generally been acknowledged that shadow banking was the “epicenter for the global financial crisis. High leverage made the shadow banking system fragile, and an initial run on shadow institutions was then transmitted throughout an interconnected global banking system. Despite this bit of now seemingly conventional wisdom, the primary response from regulators to the financial crisis has been to increase the capital requirements for chartered banks.  A new paper by Guillaume Plantin of the Toulouse School of Economics and CEPR posits that this seemingly misplaced focus not only leaves many aspects of shadow banking unaddressed by regulators, but also may foster more regulatory arbitrage and drive more banking activities to the shadow banking system.

Comments (0)
Number of views (6545)

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

ICI President Resolute that Asset Management is Not a Source of Financial Instability

Author: David Schwartz J.D. CPA
strong defense of the stability and safety of the asset management industry, Investment Company Institute President and CEO Paul Schott Stevens told the Mutual Fund and Investment Management Conference that not only are asset managers and the funds that they offer not sources of risk to the overall financial system, but some misguided efforts to regulate them as such may do vastly more harm than good.  Mr. Stevens' remarks were a reaction to reports recently issued by the Office of Financial Research (OFR) and others concluding that asset management firms and the activities in which they engage can introduce vulnerabilities that could pose, amplify, or transmit threats to financial stability.  Stevens worries that the conclusions of the OFR report and a similar report by the Financial Stability Board, "could be the predicate for new, bank-style prudential regulation of the asset management industry—which could significantly harm funds and the investors who use them."
Comments (0)
Number of views (6443)

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

FSB Extends SIFI Framework to Certain Non-Banks

Author: David Schwartz J.D. CPA

Creating a system of enhanced monitoring of systematic risk and supervision of systematically important financial institutions (SIFIs) is a key objective of global regulatory reform in the aftermath of the financial crisis. Having established criteria for determining the SIFI players in the banking and insurance sectors, the FSB and IOSCO have moved on to determining which non-banks and non-insurance companies may be considered SIFIs. In a January 8, 2014 consultative document, the FSB and IOSCO proposed a methodology for the identification of nonbank, noninsurance financial institutions (NBNI) that pose systemic risks to the global economy.  The consultation document extends the framework already established to identify bank and insurance company SIFIs to all other financial entities.

Comments (0)
Number of views (7802)

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

In With the New: Federal Reserve and OCC Issue Final Risk-Based and Leverage Capital Rules

Author: David Schwartz J.D. CPA

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Fed), published final rules in the Federal Register on October 11, 2013 revising risk-based and leverage capital requirements for banking organizations and replacing existing interim rules. The final rules consolidate three separate notices of proposed rulemaking that the OCC, Board, and FDIC published in the Federal Register on August 30, 2012, with selected changes. The rules establish a new regulatory capital framework that incorporates Basel III standards and other elements. The rule applicable to all national banks and federal savings associations "strengthens the definition of regulatory capital, increases risk-based capital requirements, and amends the methodologies for determining risk-weighted assets." Pursuant to a schedule of transition periods, the rule is effective for advanced approaches banks on January 1, 2014, and for all other banks on January 1, 2015.

Comments (0)
Number of views (7200)

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Federal Reserve Proposes Enhanced Prudential Standards and Early Remediation Requirements

Author: David Schwartz J.D. CPA
On December 20, 2011, the Federal Reserve Board of Directors published its long awaited proposal on enhanced prudential standards and early remediation requirements.  This proposal, required by the Dodd-Frank Act, would impose greater levels of regulation and supervision on certain US bank holding companies and systematically important non-bank financial companies.  
Comments (0)
Number of views (9091)
RSS
12